“The birth of Christ is the central event in the history of the earth — the very thing the whole story has been about.” — C.S. Lewis

We’ve introduced God’s big story in previous challenges using a six act play analogy.  In Act 1, God created the world, his masterpiece, like a director’s great script.  In Act 2, humans threw away the script, and the play went terribly wrong.  In Act 3, it becomes clear humans can’t get back on script ourselves.  In Act 4, God steps onto the stage of this world and begins to bring the world back on script.  In Act 5 he invites us to improvise with him in a way that makes sense of all that happened before, and arrives at the ending God wrote – the kingdom of God.

Act 4 is the turning point of the whole thing.  The moment a director steps onto a stage, the audience is shocked – no one would have expected the director to become part of the play.

But in God’s big story, there were clues – God had been writing the script this way all along.

The prophet Isaiah spoke these words for God 500 years before Jesus’ birth:

Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. He shall eat curds and honey when he knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good (Isaiah 7:14-15 ESV)

Immanuel means God with us.  See the hints here?  He’d be born of a virgin.  Both things would normally be impossible.

But now in Matthew 1:18-25 you’ll hear echoes of that Isaiah prophecy in a story you’ve probably heard before.

Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly. But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us). When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus. (Matthew 1:18-25 ESV)

Matthew saw it so clearly, and named it.

We see it so clearly in retrospect.  We may even like to think that if we met this person, we’d have recognized him as God.  This is God, walking on earth!  He fits the predictions so clearly…in retrospect.

But so many didn’t see it at the time.  Yes, he was visited by shepherds and later by Magi, and caught the attention of at least one despotic ruler, but he was mostly ignored until he was 30 years old.

That happened even though he fit around 400 prophecies written and propagated long before he was born.  He made sense of them like he made sense of this one we’re focused on today – God with us, born of a virgin.

This doesn’t seem to have been a particularly important passage to observant Jews before Jesus was born, even though it’s of great interest to Christians afterwards.  Yes, it referred to a new king being born in the royal family descending from David – that was important.  The word virgin in this passage is hard to translate from the original Hebrew – it could be as general as a young woman, or as specific as one waiting to be married any day – even though both implied sexual virginity as the cultural norm when young and unmarried.

Even then, those who’d studied these prophecies best, the scribes and Pharisees of his day, considered him a traitor and false teacher, not their God with them.

I saw an interesting TED Talk (below) that explained how often experts are wrong.  Alan Greenspan predicted uneneding economic growth right before a major recession, for example.

But looking back, we see how wrong those experts were, and the same here.

So what happened here?  Why did the experts get it wrong?

Question: Why do you think the religious experts missed that Jesus fit the prophecies and predictions?

Reminder: We have a great Christmas event coming December 14th, 2013: The Original Christmas Party.  Hope you’re coming!

Read the Bible in Sync Today

Ryan Sim - February 18, 2014

Tuesday - Study It - Reset Body and Food

Hi! Welcome to Redeem the Commute. I'm Ryan, your host for the Daily Challenge. Today's Tuesday; it's the day we explore in the Bible the topic that we introduced yesterday. We're in a series called, "Reset" right now, looking at how deciding to follow Jesus resets some really important areas of our lives. We've looked at several and this week we're looking at how it resets our view of food and our body. We're going to try to understand it using some of the words that Paul wrote to the church at Corinth. The letter is called 1 Corinthians. He wrote the following when trying to relate how we view our bodies in respect to food and how we view our bodies with respect to sexuality. Here it goes, "All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be dominated by anything. Food is meant for the stomach and the stomach for food and God will destroy both one and the other. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. The very beginning of what Paul had to say there was actually a quotation, it’s kind of hard to tell when I'm just reading it out loud, but if you'd seen it in print you'd see that, at least our modern translations of the Bible mark that out as a quotation. Paul was quoting a very common saying in his culture, "All things are lawful for me." You can imagine how that was used. People had very similar attitudes to people today, "You know what, anything goes." "Do what feels right." Paul was using food as an example in this passage of how we view our bodies. Then, he applied it later on to sexuality. We're going to look at that next week. It's a little easier to talk about food and our bodies. It's a little less emotionally charged. We can see some of the same principles at work. Ever since the 60s in particular, western culture has been very permissive. Simply said, "You can do pretty much anything that feels good to you." It's almost unlimited, but most of us, if we really think about it, do want to see some limits. We'll say, "You know what, do what feels good, do what you think is right as long as you don't hurt someone else." Or, "As long as you're not an elected official." Or, "As long as it doesn't involve children." You can go on. We want things to be as unlimited as possible in our culture, but generally, we recognize that it can't be completely unlimited. There's got to be some limit that, even if something feels good, we need to stop. The reason that Paul talks about this is it seems that the Christians in the city of Corinth were very much adopting the same, "All things are lawful for me" as their own. As Christians they knew that they had been saved by grace alone, not through anything they'd done or not done, but simply because God loved them and wanted a relationship with them. They understood the concept of grace, but then it seems they were running too far with it, saying, "Okay, since we are saved by grace, it doesn't matter what we do." "Since we don't have to earn God's love by following his law, we don't have to follow his law at all. All things are lawful for us." They were kind of taking God's amazing gift of grace and abusing it, taking it places it was never meant to go. They were using it as a license for all kinds of things and Paul uses the example of how they were just being gluttons to illustrate how they were using and abusing their bodies in other ways. We'll talk about that next week, but for now let's just think about the gluttony aspect of it. It's clear that they were abusing themselves. They were taking the bodies God had given them and using them in ways that God had never intended. They were trying to use God's gift of grace as justification for that. Paul was willing to agree to a point and say, "Yes, all things are lawful for us." "We don't need to be saved by following God's law anymore, but that doesn't mean there are no limits." What happens is, if we try to consider something completely unlimited in our eyes, "We can eat as much as we want." "We can do as much sexually as we want." All these kinds of things like that. When we take license with no limits, we very quickly become dominated by what it is we think we're there to enjoy. That's why Paul used that language. "Yeah, okay, all things are lawful, but I will not be dominated by anything." When we leave the domination of the law for grace, we have make sure we continue living under grace and we don't become bound by some other system of laws, or by something else. For example, I know a friend who found himself, at one point, in his lowest point in life, homeless and on the streets with a drug problem. He eventually found his way out of that life, but it was amazing to see what a shop-aholic he became. He left addiction to drugs for addiction to shopping and spending. It could be equally damaging in his life if he continues to spend like that in ways he can't afford. It can still ruin his relationship. It can still ruin his relationship with God. It can still ruin his life. He's just traded one domination for another. The question is, if we have to be dominated or owned by something, what's it going to be? What's the best thing to devote our lives to? What's the best thing to pursue above anything else? If it's not going to be food, if it's not going to be sexuality or drugs, what will it be, since it has to be something? We will always trade one thing for another. We can't be completely free to enjoy unlimited things in life. That's not what they were designed for. So, what will it be? Paul is suggesting that for the Christians in Corinth, it's meant to be their devotion to Jesus Christ. That's meant to be the number one thing in their life. What that leads to is the resurrection of the body. It's a term that Christians have long used to describe that what we'll pursue in this life, what we'll have in the next. If we pursue a relationship with God, we'll have a relationship with God after death as well. If we've avoided, then we won't have it. But we want it, right? In the same way what we do with our physical bodies matters now. If we see them as God's, something to be treated as if they belong to God and used for God, then after death, we can expect our bodies to be raised. It's clearly something we've been pursuing in this life, something that will belong in the next, kind of why Paul says something about stomachs, he says, to elaborate on the saying tha t all things are lawful, he says, "The stomach was made for food and food for the stomach, but God will destroy both." What he's saying is that there are some more important things than just filling our stomachs today. We want to treat our bodies as if they belong to God today. We want to treat our bodies as if they matter. We want to treat our bodies as if they matter forever and they will be with us forever, that this isn't just about feeling good for the moment. That's something I want you to consider as you discuss with some friends what you've learned today. Question: "How does what we eat and do with our bodies impact our resurrection bodies?" "What does it tell God about our interest in heavenly bodies when we abuse our physical bodies now?" Well, have a great discussion. I'll see you tomorrow.

Discuss

More Messages Associated With "Law"...

Powered by Series Engine